Peer Review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewer’s expert in particular field. The journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process. All of journal’s content should be subjected to peer review.

Every proposal submitted for publication is read at least by an editor, for an initial review. If the paper agrees with editorial policies and with a minimum quality level, is sent to two reviewers. The reviewers won't know the author's identity, as any identifying information will be stripped from the document before review.

We follow “judgments should be objective” sentence. Reviewers' comments to the editors are confidential and before passing on to the author will made anonymous. Based on the reviewers' comments, the Editorial Board makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript, and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. Whether significant revisions are proposed, acceptance is dependent on whether the author can deal with those satisfactorily. Reviewers have no conflict of interest. Reviewers point out relevant published work which is not yet cited. Reviewed articles are treated confidentially always.

Policy on Retraction of articles

The Journal follows the COPE guidelines for Retraction of articles: It can be found at following link:

http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf

Policy on plagiarism

The Journal does check plagiarism of submitted paper through Plagiarism Checker X or Veriguide. To complain, please feel free to contact us.